About the Index
A public benchmark for social preview reliability
We analyze HTML metadata quality across a stable ecommerce cohort. Cohort metrics are public; domain lookup is diagnostic only.
How the index worksAbout the Index
We analyze HTML metadata quality across a stable ecommerce cohort. Cohort metrics are public; domain lookup is diagnostic only.
How the index worksSubdomains and full URLs are normalized automatically.
This page clarifies benchmark scope, methodology, eligibility rules, and interpretation boundaries.
Public benchmark aggregates include only benchmark-eligible retail catalog domains for the snapshot window. For the latest public snapshot (full_20260227-002835, Feb 27, 2026), that yields 647 included domains after eligibility gates are applied.
A domain may be absent from benchmark aggregates if it is outside the current cohort, does not meet retail catalog eligibility criteria, or does not pass minimum coverage and URL-check thresholds during the snapshot window.
Registrable domains are the unit of analysis. Country domains are measured independently because architecture, catalog structure, and metadata behavior can differ materially across market-specific properties.
No. Measurement is HTML-only. The crawler evaluates metadata available in server-rendered HTML responses and metadata probes.
The score summarizes structural social preview reliability signals on a 0–100 scale. Higher values indicate stronger structural reliability for link preview rendering.
Unreliable represents a high likelihood of preview issues from structural signals such as missing or inaccessible image metadata and other severe metadata inconsistencies.
See also: Why Your og:image Is Not Showing (Slack, LinkedIn, or X)
Domain-level lookup and benchmark aggregation are intentionally separated. A domain can have a measured score while remaining excluded from benchmark aggregates if eligibility criteria are not satisfied for the published snapshot.
No. The public benchmark publishes aggregated distributions and methodological context, not domain leaderboards or ranking tables.
Not necessarily. A low score indicates elevated structural risk for degraded or broken social previews. It should be interpreted as reliability risk, not a blanket outage statement.
The index updates on snapshot publication cadence. Each public release includes a bounded data window, publish date, and benchmark sample size.
Yes, blocking and rate limiting can affect measured crawl accessibility. These effects are reported as aggregate transport metrics and do not imply user-facing downtime.
Prioritize structural metadata quality: ensure preview image tags are present and accessible, reduce canonical/OG inconsistencies, and improve product-page metadata consistency at scale.
See also: Why Large Images Break Social Previews